Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25054200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Mining TCGA data using Boolean implications.

Subarna Sinha, Emily K Tsang, Haoyang Zeng, Michela Meister, David L Dill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Subarna SinhaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Emily K TsangBiomedical Informatics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Haoyang ZengComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Michela MeisterDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
David L DillDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Stanford University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS 1U54 CA149145NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boolean implications (if-then rules) provide a conceptually simple, uniform and highly scalable way to find associations between pairs of random variables. In this paper, we propose to use Boolean implications to find relationships between variables of different data types (mutation, copy number alteration, DNA methylation and gene expression) from the glioblastoma (GBM) and ovarian serous cystadenoma (OV) data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We find hundreds of thousands of Boolean implications from these data sets. A direct comparison of the relationships found by Boolean implications and those found by commonly used methods for mining associations show that existing methods would miss relationships found by Boolean implications. Furthermore, many relationships exposed by Boolean implications reflect important aspects of cancer biology. Examples of our findings include cis relationships between copy number alteration, DNA methylation and expression of genes, a new hierarchy of mutations and recurrent copy number alterations, loss-of-heterozygosity of well-known tumor suppressors, and the hypermethylation phenotype associated with IDH1 mutations in GBM. The Boolean implication results used in the paper can be accessed at http://crookneck.stanford.edu/microarray/TCGANetworks/.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsComputational BiologyCystadenoma, SerousData MiningDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGlioblastomaHumansInternetMutationOvarian NeoplasmsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID25054200
PMCPMC4108374
OpenAlexW2162752924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.