Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25054149›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Biological assessment of a calcium silicate incorporated hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposite: a comparison to decellularized bone matrix.

Dong Joon Lee, Ricardo Padilla, He Zhang, Wei-Shou Hu, Ching-Chang Ko

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calcium silicate as a graft material for bone fractures: a systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. [Experiment of porous calcium phosphate/bone matrix gelatin composite cement for repairing lumbar vertebral bone defect in rabbit].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong Joon LeeNC Oral Health Institute, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB 7454, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Ricardo PadillaDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB 7454, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
He ZhangNC Oral Health Institute, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB 7454, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Wei-Shou HuDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Ching-Chang KoNC Oral Health Institute, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, CB 7454, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA ; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, 275 Brauer Hall, CB 7454, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Engineering novel bio-inspired materials for stem-cell mediated bone regenerationR01DE022816 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KO, CHING-CHANG · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Engineering a new biomaterial for stem-cell mediated bone regenerationK08DE018695 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KO, CHING-CHANG · 2008 to 2011
$507k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE018695NIDCR NIH HHS K08DE018695NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022816NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE022816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our laboratory utilized biomimicry to develop a synthetic bone scaffold based on hydroxyapatite-gelatin-calcium silicate (HGCS). Here, we evaluated the potential of HGCS scaffold in bone formation in vivo using the rat calvarial critical-sized defect (CSD). Twelve Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to four groups: control (defect only), decellularized bone matrix (DECBM), and HGCS with and without multipotent adult progenitor cells (MAPCs). DECBM was prepared by removing all the cells using SDS and NH4OH. After 12 weeks, the CSD specimens were harvested to evaluate radiographical, histological, and histomorphometrical outcomes. The in vitro osteogenic effects of the materials were studied by focal adhesion, MTS, and alizarin red. Micro-CT analysis indicated that the DECBM and the HGCS scaffold groups developed greater radiopaque areas than the other groups. Bone regeneration, assessed using histological analysis and fluorochrome labeling, was the highest in the HGCS scaffold seeded with MAPCs. The DECBM group showed limited osteoinductivity, causing a gap between the implant and host tissue. The group grafted with HGCS+MAPCs resulting in twice as much new bone formation seems to indicate a role for effective bone regeneration. In conclusion, the novel HGCS scaffold could improve bone regeneration and is a promising carrier for stem cell-mediated bone regeneration.

Indexed as

3T3 CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationCalcium CompoundsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCompressive StrengthDurapatiteGelatinMaterials TestingMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanocompositesOsteoblastsBiocompatible MaterialsCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateDurapatiteGelatinSilicates

Identifiers

PMID25054149
PMCPMC4098952
OpenAlexW1969587902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.