Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25054099›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2014

Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: a review of the literature.

Elizabeth L Lord, Raed Alobaidan, Shinji Takahashi, Jeremiah R Cohen, Christopher J Wang, Benjamin J Wang, Jeffrey C Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Congenital Cervical Stenosis: a Review of the Current Literature.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Occipitocervical measurements: correlation and consistency between multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic radiographs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Current concept in upright spinal MRI.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Review
  6. Can multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging be used to evaluate angular parameters in cervical spine? A comparison of multi-positional MRI to dynamic plain radiograph.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  7. Dynamic MRI in the evaluation of the spine: state of the art.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. DynaCT angiography for the diagnosis of bilateral bow hunter's syndrome.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth L LordDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Raed AlobaidanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Shinji TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Jeremiah R CohenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Christopher J WangUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Benjamin J WangUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Jeffrey C WangUSC Spine Center, Los Angeles, California, United States.
LAC+USC Medical Center · USOsaka City University · JPUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design Literature review. Objective The purpose of this study is to compile and review the body of literature related to kinetic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI) of the cervical spine. Methods A review of literature related to kMRI was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results We included 16 prospective and retrospective studies of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who underwent kMRI of the cervical spine. Conclusions Data suggest that kMRI is able to provide meaningful information regarding changes in the cervical spine in both normal and pathologic segments. A prospective study comparing magnetic resonance imaging and kMRI is needed to confirm clinically utility of this technology.

Indexed as

dynamic magnetic resonance imagingkinetic magnetic resonance imagingkinetic MRIkMRIMRI cervical spinepositional magnetic resonance imagining

Identifiers

PMID25054099
PMCPMC4078104
OpenAlexW1988283295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.