ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2014
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing early and late concurrent thoracic radiotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin/carboplatin chemotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021Guideline
- Anlotinib plus platinum-etoposide as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A single-arm trial.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Long-term survival data of patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.Investigational new drugs · 2022Article
- Practice Patterns of Treatment Strategy of Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Survey of Chinese Oncologists.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?Radiation oncology journal · 2019Article
- Analysis of risk factors for pulmonary complications in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer : A single-centre retrospective study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017Article
- [Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Original Chemotherapy Regimens may not be Suitable for Patients Who Failed to Respond to Induction Chemotherapy in Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016Article
- Clinical features and prognostic factors of small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study in 148 patients.Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal time for concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with etoposide and cisplatin/carboplatin (EP/EC) chemotherapy for the treatment of limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC). Randomized controlled trials comparing early and late concurrent TRT with EP/EC chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with LD SCLC were identified through searching databases such as MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. Early thoracic radiotherapy (ERT) was defined as initiating irradiation within 30 days after chemotherapy initiation. A total of 3 eligible randomized controlled trials were identified. No significant differences in the objective response rate were detected between early and late concurrent TRT [risk ratio (RR)=1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-1.18; P=0.90]. Similar results were observed in the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates between early and late concurrent TRT (RR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.88-1.27, P=0.56; RR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.77-1.71, P=0.49; RR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.66-1.22, P=0.49; and RR=1.18, 95% CI: 0.64-2.16, P=0.60, respectively). The total incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events, including anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, infection, esophageal toxicity, pulmonary toxicity, alopecia and hemorrhage with early concurrent TRT was significantly higher compared to that with late concurrent TRT (RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.43, P=0.02). Thus, the results of our study indicated that the prognosis of LD SCLC treated with late concurrent TRT and EP/EC chemotherapy is similar to that with early concurrent TRT, although the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was lower in LD SCLC patients treated with late concurrent TRT combined with EP/EC chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.