ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2014
Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine for patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fludarabine and treosulfan compared with other reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Trial
- Fludarabine melphalan versus fludarabine treosulfan for reduced intensity conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Article
- [Therapeutic effect of CY-fTBI and BMM conditioning regimen in the process of allo-HSCT treating Ⅲ,Ⅳ non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 15 years analysis of single-center].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) remains challenging. In this retrospective study, 88 patients with refractory or relapsed NHL received treosulfan and fludarabine as a reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Of the 88 intensely pre-treated patients, 73 experienced a relapse, with 18 of the 88 patients experiencing an early relapse (ER; <6 months from the last chemotherapy). At the time of allo-HSCT, 26 patients were in complete remission (CR) and 43 in partial remission (PR), 12 patients had progressive disease (PD) and 7 had stable disease (SD). A total of 47 patients received an autologous graft followed by allo-HSCT. Following allo-HSCT, 69 of the 88 patients were in CR and 7 were in PR, resulting in an overall response rate of 86.4% (76/88). A total of 33 patients achieved a CR from PR, as did 6 patients from PD and 5 from SD. Of the 88 patients, 43 (49%) were alive at the end of the follow-up period. The patients who directly underwent allo-HSCT without prior auto-HSCT exhibited a better disease-free survival (DFS; P=0.038) with a tendency (P=0.077) for a better overall survival (OS). The patients with ER exhibited a probability of OS of 0.35±0.12 after 3 and 7 years. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) exerted a positive effect on OS and DFS (for limited cGvHD vs. no cGvHD, P=0.002 and 0.004, respectively). In conclusion, allogeneic stem cell transplantation following conditioning with treosufan and fludarabine constitutes a viable therapeutic option for patients with refractory or relapsed NHL and should be considered early during the course of salvage treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.