Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25053646›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2014

Engineering α-amylase levels in wheat grain suggests a highly sophisticated level of carbohydrate regulation during development.

Alex Whan, Anne-Sophie Dielen, Jos Mieog, Andrew F Bowerman, Hannah M Robinson, Keren Byrne, Michelle Colgrave, Philip J Larkin, Crispin A Howitt, Matthew K Morell and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Late-Maturity Alpha-Amylase in Wheat (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MaizeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex WhanCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Anne-Sophie DielenCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Jos MieogCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Andrew F BowermanCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Hannah M RobinsonCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Keren ByrneCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. CSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Michelle ColgraveCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. CSIRO Animal, Food and Health Sciences, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Philip J LarkinCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Crispin A HowittCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Matthew K MorellCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Jean-Philippe RalCSIRO Food Futures National Research Flagship, GPO Box 1600, Canberra ACT 2601 Australia. Jean.ral@csiro.au.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUAnimal, Food and Health Sciences · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat starch degradation requires the synergistic action of different amylolytic enzymes. Our spatio-temporal study of wheat α-amylases throughout grain development shows that AMY3 is the most abundant isoform compared with the other known α-amylases. Endosperm-specific over-expression of AMY3 resulted in an increase of total α-amylase activity in harvested grains. Unexpectedly, increased activity did not have a significant impact on starch content or composition but led to an increase of soluble carbohydrate (mainly sucrose) in dry grain. In AMY3 overexpression lines (A3OE), germination was slightly delayed and triacylglycerol (TAG) content was increased in the endosperm of mature grain. Despite increased AMY3 transcript and protein content throughout grain development, alterations of α-amylase activity and starch granule degradation were not detected until grain maturation, suggesting a post-translational inhibition of α-amylase activity in the endosperm during the starch filling period. These findings show unexpected effects of a high level of α-amylase on grain development and composition, notably in carbon partitioning and TAG accumulation, and suggest the presence of a hitherto unknown regulatory pathway during grain filling.

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesCarbohydrate MetabolismGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsTriglyceridesTriticumalpha-AmylasesPlant ProteinsTriglyceridesAMY3endosperm.oilstarchsucrosewheat

Identifiers

PMID25053646
PMCPMC4157717
OpenAlexW2136828947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.