Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25053537›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2015

Mechanotransduction in epidermal Merkel cells.

Masashi Nakatani, Srdjan Maksimovic, Yoshichika Baba, Ellen A Lumpkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sensory cells in tunicates: insights into mechanoreceptor evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Continuous, multidimensional coding of 3D complex tactile stimuli by primary sensory neurons of the vibrissal system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanics to pre-process information for the fine tuning of mechanoreceptors.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Review
  13. Diagnostic accuracy of a panel of immunohistochemical and molecular markers to distinguish Merkel cell carcinoma from other neuroendocrine carcinomas.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masashi NakataniDepartment of Dermatology, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Avenue, room 302B, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Srdjan Maksimovic
Yoshichika Baba
Ellen A Lumpkin

Funding

Mechanisms of mechanosensory transduction in Merkel cellsR01AR051219 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2004 to 2020
$6.0M
Peripheral Mechanisms Governing Tactile Encoding During Normal Target RemodelingR01NS073119 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GERLING, GREGORY JOHN, LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2010 to 2016
$2.5M
An Optogenetic Strategy to Determine if Merkel Cells Are Excitatory in the SkinR21AR062307 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LUMPKIN, ELLEN A · 2011 to 2012
$396k
Synaptic Transmission In Mammalian Cutaneous Touch ReceptorsF32NS080544 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAKSIMOVIC, SRDJAN · 2013 to 2013
$42k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051219NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR051219NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR062307NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS080544NINDS NIH HHS F32NS080544NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073119NINDS NIH HHS R01NS073119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular and molecular basis of vertebrate touch reception remains least understood among the traditional five senses. Somatosensory afferents that innervate the skin encode distinct tactile qualities, such as flutter, slip, and pressure. Gentle touch is thought to be transduced by somatosensory afferents whose tactile end organs selectively filter mechanical stimuli. These tactile end organs comprise afferent terminals in association with non-neuronal cell types such as Merkel cells, keratinocytes, and Schwann cells. An open question is whether these non-neuronal cells serve primarily as passive mechanical filters or whether they actively participate in mechanosensory transduction. This question has been most extensively studied in Merkel cells, which are epidermal cells that complex with sensory afferents in regions of high tactile acuity such as fingertips, whisker follicles, and touch domes. Merkel cell-neurite complexes mediate slowly adapting type I (SAI) responses, which encode sustained pressure and represent object features with high fidelity. How Merkel cells contribute to unique SAI firing patterns has been debated for decades; however, three recent studies in rodent models provide some direct answers. First, whole-cell recordings demonstrate that Merkel cells are touch-sensitive cells with fast, mechanically activated currents that require Piezo2. Second, optogenetics and intact recordings show that Merkel cells mediate sustained SAI firing. Finally, loss-of-function studies in transgenic mouse models reveal that SAI afferents are also touch sensitive. Together, these studies identify molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in Merkel cells, reveal unexpected functions for these cells in touch, and support a revised, two-receptor site model of mechanosensory transduction.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CommunicationEpidermal CellsEpidermisHumansIon ChannelsMechanotransduction, CellularMerkel CellsModels, BiologicalTouchIon ChannelsPIEZO2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25053537
PMCPMC4282617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.