ReviewIntensive care medicine2014
Our paper 20 years later: how has withdrawal from mechanical ventilation changed?
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02566512 (Assessment of Cough Strength in Patients With Tracheostomies), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Cough Strength in Patients With Tracheostomies
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a quality improvement program on weaning from mechanical ventilation: a cluster randomized trial.Intensive care medicine · 2015Trial
- Weaning management in a patient with heart dysfunction: a case report.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Cardiopulmonary interactions during ventilator weaning.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Observational
- Cardiovascular failure and weaning.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Transcutaneous CO2 monitoring: a new tool to identify spontaneous breathing trial failure during weaning from mechanical ventilation. A pilot cohort study.Intensive care medicine · 2016Article
- Acute respiratory failure in patients with hematological malignancies: outcomes according to initial ventilation strategy. A groupe de recherche respiratoire en réanimation onco-hématologique (Grrr-OH) study.Annals of intensive care · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Withdrawal from mechanical ventilation (or weaning) is one of the most common procedures in intensive care units. Almost 20 years ago, we published one of the seminal papers on weaning in which we showed that the best method for withdrawal from mechanical ventilation in difficult-to-wean patients was a once-daily spontaneous breathing trial with a T-piece. Progress has not stood still, and in the intervening years up to the present several other studies, by our group and others, have shaped weaning into an evidence-based technique. The results of these studies have been applied progressively to routine clinical practice. Currently, withdrawal from mechanical ventilation can be summarized as the evaluation of extubation readiness based on the patient's performance during a spontaneous breathing trial. This trial can be performed with a T-piece, which is the most common approach, or with continuous positive airway pressure or low levels of pressure support. Most patients can be disconnected after passing the first spontaneous breathing trial. In patients who fail the first attempt at withdrawal, the use of a once-daily spontaneous breathing trial or a gradual reduction in pressure support are the preferred weaning methods. However, new applications of standard techniques, such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, or new methods of mechanical ventilation, such as automatic tube compensation, automated closed-loop systems, and automated knowledge-based weaning systems, can play a role in the management of the patients with difficult or prolonged weaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.