Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25052784›Full record

Trial reportJournal of psychoactive drugs

Cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients with co-occurring problematic alcohol use: effect of telephone-administered vs. face-to-face treatment-a secondary analysis.

Raj K Kalapatapu, Joyce Ho, Xuan Cai, Sophia Vinogradov, Steven L Batki, David C Mohr

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of psychoactive drugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. TelehealthPsychological medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Evidence-Based Psychotherapy in Primary Care.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raj K Kalapatapua Department of Psychiatry , University of California , San Francisco , CA.
Joyce Ho
Xuan Cai
Sophia Vinogradov
Steven L Batki
David C Mohr
Northwestern University · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Administration of CBT for DepressionR01MH059708 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MOHR, DAVID CURTIS · 2000 to 2011
$7.2M
Technology Assisted intervention for the Treatment and Prevention of DepressionP20MH090318 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MOHR, DAVID CURTIS · 2011 to 2015
$4.7M
OT-based Cognitive Rehabilitation of Cocaine AbusersK23DA034883 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KALAPATAPU, RAJKUMAR KIRAN · 2013 to 2017
$900k
Integrated Telemental Health Intervention for Depression in Primary CareR34MH078922 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MOHR, DAVID CURTIS · 2008 to 2010
$612k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA034883NIDA NIH HHS K23DA034883NIMH NIH HHS P20 MH090318NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059708NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH059708NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH078922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This secondary analysis of a larger study compared adherence to telephone-administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (T-CBT) vs. face-to-face CBT and depression outcomes in depressed primary care patients with co-occurring problematic alcohol use. To our knowledge, T-CBT has never been directly compared to face-to-face CBT in such a sample of primary care patients. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to face-to-face CBT or T-CBT for depression. Participants receiving T-CBT (n = 50) and face-to-face CBT (n = 53) were compared at baseline, end of treatment (week 18), and three-month and six-month follow-ups. Face-to-face CBT and T-CBT groups did not significantly differ in age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, severity of depression, antidepressant use, and total score on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Face-to-face CBT and T-CBT groups were similar on all treatment adherence outcomes and depression outcomes at all time points. T-CBT and face-to-face CBT had similar treatment adherence and efficacy for the treatment of depression in depressed primary care patients with co-occurring problematic alcohol use. When targeting patients who might have difficulties in accessing care, primary care clinicians may consider both types of CBT delivery when treating depression in patients with co-occurring problematic alcohol use.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyOffice VisitsPrimary Health CareTelephoneAdultAlcoholismDepressionDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTelemedicineTime Factorsalcoholdepressedface-to-faceprimary caretelephone

Identifiers

PMID25052784
PMCPMC4110640
OpenAlexW1979713587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.