Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25052418›Full record

SynthesisHeart failure reviews2014

Incremental value of natriuretic peptide measurement in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF): a systematic review.

Pasqualina L Santaguida, Andrew C Don-Wauchope, Usman Ali, Mark Oremus, Judy A Brown, Amy Bustamam, Stephen A Hill, Ronald A Booth, Nazmul Sohel, Robert McKelvie and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers of Hemodynamic Congestion in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Acute on chronic heart failure-Which variations on B-type natriuretic peptide levels?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pasqualina L SantaguidaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, MIP Suite 309A, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Andrew C Don-Wauchope
Usman Ali
Mark Oremus
Judy A Brown
Amy Bustamam
Stephen A Hill
Ronald A Booth
Nazmul Sohel
Robert McKelvie
Cynthia Balion
Parminder Raina
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) independently add incremental value for predicting mortality and morbidity in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Medline(®), Embase™, AMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL were searched from 1989 to June 2012. We also searched reference lists of included articles, systematic reviews, and the gray literature. Studies were screened for eligibility criteria and assessed for risk of bias. Data were extracted on study design, population demographics, assay cutpoints, prognostic risk prediction model covariates, statistical methods, outcomes, and results. From 183 citations, only seven studies (5 BNP and 2 NT-proBNP) considered incremental value in ADHF subjects admitted to acute care centers. Admission assay levels and length of follow-up varied for BNP studies (31 days to 12 months) and for NT-proBNP studies (25-82 months). All studies presented at least one estimate of incremental value of BNP/NT-proBNP relative to the base prognostic model. Using discrimination or likelihood statistics, these studies consistently showed that BNP or NT-proBNP increased model performance. Three studies used reclassification and model validation computations to establish incremental value; these studies showed less consistency with respect to added value. In conclusion, the literature assessing incremental value of BNP/NT-proBNP in ADHF populations is limited to seven studies evaluating only mortality outcomes and at moderate risk of bias. Although there were differences in the base risk prediction models, assay cutpoints, and lengths of follow-up, there was consistency in BNP/NT-proBNP adding incremental value in prediction models in ADHF patients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseBiomarkersGlobal HealthHeart FailureHumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, Brain

Identifiers

PMID25052418
OpenAlexW2009592516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.