Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25052416›Full record

ArticleHeredity2014

Introgression study reveals two quantitative trait loci involved in interspecific variation in memory retention among Nasonia wasp species.

K M Hoedjes, H M Smid, L E M Vet, J H Werren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of olfactory circuits in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K M HoedjesLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
H M SmidLaboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
L E M Vet1] Laboratory of Entomology, Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands [2] Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
J H WerrenDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes involved in the process of memory formation have been studied intensively in model organisms; however, little is known about the mechanisms that are responsible for natural variation in memory dynamics. There is substantial variation in memory retention among closely related species in the parasitic wasp genus Nasonia. After a single olfactory conditioning trial, N. vitripennis consolidates long-term memory that lasts at least 6 days. Memory of the closely related species N. giraulti is present at 24 h but is lost within 2 days after a single trial. The genetic basis of this interspecific difference in memory retention was studied in a backcrossing experiment in which the phenotype of N. giraulti was selected for in the background of N. vitripennis for up to five generations. A genotyping microarray revealed five regions that were retained in wasps with decreased memory retention. Independent introgressions of individual candidate regions were created using linked molecular markers and tested for memory retention. One region on chromosome 1 (spanning ∼5.8 cM) and another on chromosome 5 (spanning ∼25.6 cM) resulted in decreased memory after 72 h, without affecting 24-h-memory retention. This phenotype was observed in both heterozygous and homozygous individuals. Transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein and a dopamine receptor, both with a known function in memory formation, are within these genomic regions and are candidates for the regulation of memory retention. Concluding, this study demonstrates a powerful approach to study variation in memory retention and provides a basis for future research on its genetic basis.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalMemoryQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsChimeraCrosses, GeneticFemaleGenetic MarkersGenotypeLearningMaleOlfactory PerceptionPhenotypeRetention, PsychologySmellSpecies SpecificityGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25052416
PMCPMC4274617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.