Sex, death, and the diagnosis gap.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sex differences in mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: a contemporary nationwide registry and prospective cohort analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2025
   Article
2. Evaluation of serum samples in long cryopreservation for SomaScan proteomics and sex differences in elderly Japanese adults.Scientific reports · 2025
   Observational
3. Risk Perception for Developing Cardiometabolic Disease Among Women Diagnosed with Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2024
   Article
4. Sex-Specific Thresholds for Cardiac Biomarkers-We Need to Move Forward.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
   Review
5. Clinical and imaging characteristics of cardiac magnetic resonance presenting with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries in China.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022
   Article
6. Impact of multiple substance use on circulating ST2, a biomarker of adverse cardiac remodelling, in women.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2022
   Article
7. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease and heart failure biomarkers.Biology of sex differences · 2018
   Review
8. Sex Differences in the Coronary System.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2018
   Review
9. Sex differences in coronary heart disease risk factors: rename it ischaemic heart disease!Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2017
   Article
10. Myocardial perfusion imaging in women for the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease-state-of-the-evidence and clinical recommendations.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
11. Sex-specific precision medicine: targeting CRT-D and other cardiovascular interventions to those most likely to benefit.European heart journal · 2017
    Article
12. Excess Cardiovascular Risk in Women Relative to Men Referred for Coronary Angiography Is Associated With Severely Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve, Not Obstructive Disease.Circulation · 2017
    Article
13. Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease: interconnected paths that enable detection of the subclinical stages of obstetric and cardiovascular diseases.Integrated blood pressure control · 2017
    Review
14. The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of myocardial ischemia in women.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Review
15. The diagnosis of CAD in women: addressing the unmet need - a report from the national expert roundtable meeting.Population health management · 2015
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Sex differences in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction: a systematic review.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as