Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25052313›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

Parental age effects, but no evidence for an intrauterine effect in the transmission of myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Fernando Morales, Melissa Vásquez, Patricia Cuenca, Domingo Campos, Carolina Santamaría, Gerardo Del Valle, Roberto Brian, Mauricio Sittenfeld, Darren G Monckton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetics of Myotonic Dystrophies: A Minireview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Repeat instability during DNA repair: Insights from model systems.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Morales1] Cuidad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [2] Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [3] Centro de Investigaciones en Neurociencias, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Melissa Vásquez1] Cuidad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [2] Centro de Investigaciones en Neurociencias, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Patricia Cuenca1] Cuidad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [2] Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [3] Centro de Investigaciones en Neurociencias, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Domingo CamposInstituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIP), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Carolina Santamaría1] Cuidad Universitaria Rodrigo Facio, Instituto de Investigaciones en Salud (INISA), Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica [2] Escuela de Nutrición, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Gerardo Del ValleLaboratorio de Neurofisiología (Neurolab), Curridabat, San José, Costa Rica.
Roberto BrianServicio de Neurología, Hospital Nacional de Niños, San José, Costa Rica.
Mauricio SittenfeldServicio de Neurología, Hospital San Juan de Dios, San José, Costa Rica.
Darren G MoncktonInstitute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Universidad de Costa Rica · CRHospital Nacional de Niños · CRUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is caused by the expansion of an unstable CTG repeat (g.17294_17296(45_1000)) with more repeats associated with increased disease severity and reduced age at onset. Expanded disease-associated alleles are highly unstable in both the germline and soma. Germline instability is expansion biased, providing a molecular explanation for anticipation. Somatic instability is expansion biased, size- and age-dependent, features that have compromised genotype-phenotype correlations and intergenerational studies. We corrected these confounding factors by estimating the progenitor allele length in 54 father-offspring and 52 mother-offspring pairs in Costa Rican DM1 families. Not surprisingly, we found major parental allele length effects on the size of the allele transmitted, the magnitude of the intergenerational length change, the age at onset in the next generation and the degree of anticipation in both male and female transmissions. We also detected, for the first time, an age-of-parent effect for both male and female transmission. Interestingly, we found no evidence for an intrauterine effect in the transmission of congenital DM1, suggesting previous reports may have been an artefact of age-dependent somatic instability and sampling bias. These data provide new insights into the germline dynamics of the CTG repeat and opportunities for providing additional advice and more accurate risk assessments to prospective parents in DM1 families.

Indexed as

ParentsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultAge FactorsAge of OnsetAllelesAnticipation, GeneticCosta RicaFamilyFemaleHumansInheritance PatternsMaleMyotonic DystrophyPregnancySex Factors

Identifiers

PMID25052313
PMCPMC4402617
OpenAlexW2038112084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.