Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25052159›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2015

Biomarkers improve clinical outcome predictors of mortality following non-penetrating severe traumatic brain injury.

Linda Papa, Claudia S Robertson, Kevin K W Wang, Gretchen M Brophy, H Julia Hannay, Shelley Heaton, Ilona Schmalfuss, Andrea Gabrielli, Ronald L Hayes, Steven A Robicsek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of spectrin breakdown products in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Potential Blood-based Biomarkers for Concussion.Sports medicine and arthroscopy review · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Concussion in the UK: a contemporary narrative review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2022
    Review
  16. Biomarkers in traumatic brain injury: new concepts.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Linda PapaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, 86 W. Underwood (S-200), Orlando, FL, 32806, USA, lpstat@aol.com.
Claudia S Robertson
Kevin K W Wang
Gretchen M Brophy
H Julia Hannay
Shelley Heaton
Ilona Schmalfuss
Andrea Gabrielli
Ronald L Hayes
Steven A Robicsek
University of Florida · USBanyan Biomarkers (United States) · USBaylor College of Medicine · USOrlando Regional Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Houston · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study assessed whether early levels of biomarkers measured in CSF within 24-h of severe TBI would improve the clinical prediction of 6-months mortality.

methodsThis prospective study conducted at two Level 1 Trauma Centers enrolled adults with severe TBI (GCS ≤8) requiring a ventriculostomy as well as control subjects. Ventricular CSF was sampled within 24-h of injury and analyzed for seven candidate biomarkers (UCH-L1, MAP-2, SBDP150, SBDP145, SBDP120, MBP, and S100B). The International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) scores (Core, Extended, and Lab) were calculated for each patient to determine risk of 6-months mortality. The IMPACT models and biomarkers were assessed alone and in combination.

resultsThere were 152 patients enrolled, 131 TBI patients and 21 control patients. Thirty six (27 %) patients did not survive to 6 months. Biomarkers were all significantly elevated in TBI versus controls (p < 0.001). Peak levels of UCH-L1, SBDP145, MAP-2, and MBP were significantly higher in non-survivors (p < 0.05). Of the seven biomarkers measured at 12-h post-injury MAP-2 (p = 0.004), UCH-L1 (p = 0.024), and MBP (p = 0.037) had significant unadjusted hazard ratios. Of the seven biomarkers measured at the earliest time within 24-h, MAP-2 (p = 0.002), UCH-L1 (p = 0.016), MBP (p = 0.021), and SBDP145 (0.029) had the most significant elevations. When the IMPACT Extended Model was combined with the biomarkers, MAP-2 contributed most significantly to the survival models with sensitivities of 97-100 %.

conclusionsThese data suggest that early levels of MAP-2 in combination with clinical data provide enhanced prognostic capabilities for mortality at 6 months.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBrain InjuriesFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexYoung AdultBiomarkersMAP2 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25052159
OpenAlexW1978466405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.