ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2014
Tissues cIMPly do not lie.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apolipoprotein E favours the blunting by high-fat diet of prostacyclin receptor activation in the mouse aorta.British journal of pharmacology · 2018Article
- Nitric Oxide: From Good to Bad.Annals of vascular diseases · 2018Review
- Biased activity of soluble guanylyl cyclase: the Janus face of thymoquinone.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2017Review
- Recent progress in the field of cIMP research.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology under new editorship: change and continuity.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Hypoxic Vasospasm Mediated by cIMP: When Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Turns Bad.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2015Review
- Report on the Third Symposium "cCMP and cUMP as New Second Messengers".Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2015Article
- PDE and sGC hand in hand to see the light.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25052042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.