Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25051912›Full record

ReviewTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Focus on genetic and epigenetic events of colorectal cancer pathogenesis: implications for molecular diagnosis.

Federica Zoratto, Luigi Rossi, Monica Verrico, Anselmo Papa, Enrico Basso, Angelo Zullo, Luigi Tomao, Adriana Romiti, Giuseppe Lo Russo, Silverio Tomao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Insights into Nanotechnology in Colorectal Cancer.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Federica ZorattoOncology Unit 2, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Pisana, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Pisa, 56126, Italy, federica.z@libero.it.
Luigi Rossi
Monica Verrico
Anselmo Papa
Enrico Basso
Angelo Zullo
Luigi Tomao
Adriana Romiti
Giuseppe Lo Russo
Silverio Tomao
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITNational Cancer Institute · MYOspedale Regina Margherita · ITOspedale San Carlo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Originally, colorectal cancer (CRC) tumorigenesis was understood as a multistep process that involved accumulation of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes mutations, such as APC, TP53 and KRAS. However, this assumption proposed a relatively limited repertoire of genetic alterations. In the last decade, there have been major advances in knowledge of multiple molecular pathways involved in CRC pathogenesis, particularly regarding cytogenetic and epigenetic events. Microsatellite instability, chromosomal instability and CpG island methylator phenotype are the most analyzed cytogenetic changes, while DNA methylation, modifications in histone proteins and microRNAs (miRNAs) were analyzed in the field of epigenetic alterations. Therefore, CRC development results from interactions at many levels between genetic and epigenetic amendments. Furthermore, hereditary cancer syndrome and individual or environmental risk factors should not be ignored. The difficulties in this setting are addressed to understand the molecular basis of individual susceptibility to CRC and to determine the roles of genetic and epigenetic alterations, in order to yield more effective prevention strategies in CRC patients and directing their treatment. This review summarizes the most investigated biomolecular pathways involved in CRC pathogenesis, their role as biomarkers for early CRC diagnosis and their possible use to stratify susceptible patients into appropriate screening or surveillance programs.

Indexed as

Pathology, MolecularBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticChromosomal InstabilityColorectal NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMicroRNAsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID25051912
OpenAlexW1982529507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.