ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014
Updated investigations of cancer excesses in individuals born or resident in the vicinity of Sellafield and Dounreay.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Incidence of solid cancers among residents near nuclear facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- The risk of thyroid cancer in relation to residential proximity to nuclear power plants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024Pooled it
- National analysis of cancer mortality and proximity to nuclear power plants in the United States.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Residential proximity to nuclear power plants and cancer incidence in Massachusetts, USA (2000-2018).Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Article
- Thyroid cancer incidence in cohorts exposed in childhood toRadiation and environmental biophysics · 2024Article
- Radiation-Related Thyroid Cancer.Endocrine reviews · 2024Review
- The Association Between Childhood Leukemia and Population Mixing: An Artifact of Focusing on Clusters?Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- Childhood cancer research in oxford III: The work of CCRG on ionising radiation.British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- A case-control study of occupational contact levels in the childhood leukaemia cluster at Seascale, Cumbria, UK.BMJ open · 2015Article
- Comment on 'Updated investigations of cancer excesses in individuals born or resident in the vicinity of Sellafield and Dounreay': premature all-clear for nuclear power.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Response to: Comment on 'Updated investigations of cancer excesses in individuals born or resident in the vicinity of Sellafield and Dounreay'.British journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Childhood leukaemia and nuclear installations: the long and winding road.British journal of cancer · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarlier studies have shown raised risks of leukaemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children, teenagers and young adults resident either at birth or diagnosis in Seascale. Some increases in cancer risk in these age groups have also been noted among those living around Dounreay. We aimed to update previous analyses relating to areas close to these nuclear installations by considering data from an additional 16 years of follow-up.
methodsCross-sectional analyses compared cancer incidence rates for 1963-2006 among those aged 0-24 years at diagnosis living in geographically specified areas around either Sellafield or Dounreay with general population rates. Cancer incidence for the period 1971-2006 among the cohort of Cumbrian births between 1950 and 2006 was compared to national incidence for 1971-2006 using person-years analysis. Cancer among those born in the postcode sector closest to Dounreay was compared with that among those born in the three adjoining postcode sectors. Analyses considered both cancer overall and ICD-O-3 defined diagnostic subgroups including leukaemia, central nervous system tumours and other malignancies.
resultsApart from previously reported raised risks, no new significantly increased risks for cancer overall or any diagnostic subgroup were found among children or teenagers and young adults living around either nuclear installation. Individuals born close to the installations from 1950 to 2006 were not shown to be at any increased risk of cancer during the period 1971 to date.
conclusionsAnalysis of recent data suggests that children, teenagers and young adults currently living close to Sellafield and Dounreay are not at an increased risk of developing cancer. Equally, there is no evidence of any increased cancer risk later in life among those resident in these areas at birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.