Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25051353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Health outcome after major trauma: what are we measuring?

Karen Hoffman, Elaine Cole, E Diane Playford, Eva Grill, Helene L Soberg, Karim Brohi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Chronic pain despite anatomical restoration: a prospective cohort study on one-year outcomes and pain predictors following spinopelvic fixation for trauma.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Co-design of an outcome measure for hand burn injuries.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Long-term functional outcomes in polytrauma: a fundamentally new approach is needed in prediction.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Completeness and Mismatch of Patient-Important Outcomes After Trauma.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Monitoring and Measurement in Child and Adolescent Mental Health: It's about More than Just Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Seven-year excess mortality, functional outcome and health status after trauma in Hong Kong.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Regional anaesthesia research - where to now?British journal of pain · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Patient Perspectives on Key Outcomes for Vocational Rehabilitation Interventions Following Traumatic Injury.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen HoffmanCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Elaine ColeCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
E Diane PlayfordUniversity College London (UCL) institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom.
Eva GrillLudwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Munich, Germany.
Helene L SobergDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Karim BrohiCentre for Trauma Sciences, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceTrauma is a global disease and is among the leading causes of disability in the world. The importance of outcome beyond trauma survival has been recognised over the last decade. Despite this there is no internationally agreed approach for assessment of health outcome and rehabilitation of trauma patients.

objectiveTo systematically examine to what extent outcomes measures evaluate health outcomes in patients with major trauma. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (from 2006-2012) were searched for studies evaluating health outcome after traumatic injuries. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies of adult patients with injuries involving at least two body areas or organ systems were included. Information on study design, outcome measures used, sample size and outcomes were extracted. The World Health Organisation International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) were used to evaluate to what extent outcome measures captured health impacts.

results34 studies from 755 studies were included in the review. 38 outcome measures were identified. 21 outcome measures were used only once and only five were used in three or more studies. Only 6% of all possible health impacts were captured. Concepts related to activity and participation were the most represented but still only captured 12% of all possible concepts in this domain. Measures performed very poorly in capturing concepts related to body function (5%), functional activities (11%) and environmental factors (2%).

conclusionOutcome measures used in major trauma capture only a small proportion of health impacts. There is no inclusive classification for measuring disability or health outcome following trauma. The ICF may provide a useful framework for the development of a comprehensive health outcome measure for trauma care.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultDisability EvaluationHealth StatusHumansMultiple TraumaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersons with Disabilities

Identifiers

PMID25051353
PMCPMC4106876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.