ArticleDevelopmental biology2014
Identification of genes driving lineage divergence from single-cell gene expression data in C. elegans.
Article in Developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is an ideal model organism to study the cell fate specification mechanisms during embryogenesis. It is generally believed that cell fate specification in C. elegans is mainly mediated by lineage-based mechanisms, where the specification paths are driven forward by a succession of asymmetric cell divisions. However, little is known about how each binary decision is made by gene regulatory programs. In this study, we endeavor to obtain a global understanding of cell lineage/fate divergence processes during the early embryogenesis of C. elegans. We reanalyzed the EPIC data set, which traced the expression level of reporter genes at single-cell resolution on a nearly continuous time scale up to the 350-cell stage in C. elegans embryos. We examined the expression patterns for a total of 131 genes from 287 embryos with high quality image recordings, among which 86 genes have replicate embryos. Our results reveal that during early embryogenesis, divergence between sister lineages could be largely explained by a few genes. We predicted genes driving lineage divergence and explored their expression patterns in sister lineages. Moreover, we found that divisions leading to fate divergence are associated with a large number of genes being differentially expressed between sister lineages. Interestingly, we found that the developmental paths of lineages could be differentiated by a small set of genes. Therefore, our results support the notion that the cell fate patterns in C. elegans are achieved through stepwise binary decisions punctuated by cell divisions. Our predicted genes driving lineage divergence provide good starting points for future detailed characterization of their roles in the embryogenesis in this important model organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.