Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25050704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The effects of CAMPATH-1H on cell viability do not correlate to the CD52 density on the cell surface.

Fuiyee Lee, Martha Luevano, Paul Veys, Kwee Yong, Alejandro Madrigal, Bronwen E Shaw, Aurore Saudemont

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The immunological function of CD52 and its targeting in organ transplantation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2017
    Review
  4. Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs on Humoral Allosensitization after Kidney Transplant.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016
    Review
  5. ABO, alemtuzumab and allogeneic transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fuiyee LeeUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Martha LuevanoUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Paul VeysUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS, London, United Kingdom.
Kwee YongUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Alejandro MadrigalUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Bronwen E ShawUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Aurore SaudemontUniversity College London, Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Anthony Nolan Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBLondon Cancer · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is one of the main complications after hematological stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CAMPATH-1H is used in the pre-transplant conditioning regimen to effectively reduce GvHD by targeting CD52 antigens on T cells resulting in their depletion. Information regarding CD52 expression and the effects of CAMPATH-1H on immune cells is scant and limited to peripheral blood (PB) T and B cells. To date, the effects of CAMPATH-1H on cord blood (CB) cells has not been studied. Here we aimed to analyze CD52 expression and the effects of CAMPATH-1H on fresh or frozen, resting or activated, PB mononuclear cells (PBMC) and CB mononuclear cells (CBMC). In resting state, CD52 expression was higher in CB than PB T cell subsets (653.66 ± 26.68 vs 453.32 ± 19.2) and B cells (622.2±20.65 vs 612.0 ± 9.101) except for natural killer (NK) cells where CD52 levels were higher in PB (421.0 ± 9.857) than CB (334.3 ± 9.559). In contrast, CD52 levels were comparable across all cell types after activation. CAMPATH-1H depleted resting cells more effectively than activated cells with approximately 80-95% of apoptosis observed with low levels of necrosis. There was no direct correlation between cell surface CD52 density and depleting effects of CAMPATH-1H. In addition, no difference in cell viability was noted when different concentrations of CAMPATH-1H were used. CD52 was not expressed on HSC but began to be expressed as the cells differentiate, implying that CAMPATH-1H could potentially affect HSC differentiation and proliferation. Our study provides insightful information, which contributes to the better understanding in the use of CAMPATH-1H as part of the conditioning regime in HSCT.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsB-LymphocytesCD52 AntigenCell SeparationCell SurvivalGlycoproteinsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLeukocytes, MononuclearAlemtuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsCD52 AntigenCD52 protein, humanGlycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID25050704
PMCPMC4106894
OpenAlexW2055118444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.