Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25050551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Nutrient addition dramatically accelerates microbial community succession.

Joseph E Knelman, Steven K Schmidt, Ryan C Lynch, John L Darcy, Sarah C Castle, Cory C Cleveland, Diana R Nemergut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph E KnelmanInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Steven K SchmidtDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Ryan C LynchDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
John L DarcyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Sarah C CastleDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.
Cory C ClevelandDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America.
Diana R NemergutInstitute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America; Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological mechanisms driving community succession are widely debated, particularly for microorganisms. While successional soil microbial communities are known to undergo predictable changes in structure concomitant with shifts in a variety of edaphic properties, the causal mechanisms underlying these patterns are poorly understood. Thus, to specifically isolate how nutrients--important drivers of plant succession--affect soil microbial succession, we established a full factorial nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization plot experiment in recently deglaciated (∼3 years since exposure), unvegetated soils of the Puca Glacier forefield in Southeastern Peru. We evaluated soil properties and examined bacterial community composition in plots before and one year after fertilization. Fertilized soils were then compared to samples from three reference successional transects representing advancing stages of soil development ranging from 5 years to 85 years since exposure. We found that a single application of +NP fertilizer caused the soil bacterial community structure of the three-year old soils to most resemble the 85-year old soils after one year. Despite differences in a variety of soil edaphic properties between fertilizer plots and late successional soils, bacterial community composition of +NP plots converged with late successional communities. Thus, our work suggests a mechanism for microbial succession whereby changes in resource availability drive shifts in community composition, supporting a role for nutrient colimitation in primary succession. These results suggest that nutrients alone, independent of other edaphic factors that change with succession, act as an important control over soil microbial community development, greatly accelerating the rate of succession.

Indexed as

FertilizersIce CoverMicrobiotaMolecular TypingPeruPhylogenySoil MicrobiologyFertilizers

Identifiers

PMID25050551
PMCPMC4106831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.