Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25050154›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2014

Protein-ligand cocrystal structures: we can do better.

Charles H Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Strategies for carbohydrate model building, refinement and validation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  13. Ligand fitting with CCP4.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  14. AceDRG: a stereochemical description generator for ligands.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  15. Validation and extraction of molecular-geometry information from small-molecule databases.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Carbohydrate anomalies in the PDB.Nature chemical biology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Charles H ReynoldsGfree Bio, LLC , 3805 Old Easton Road, Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18902, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large body of evidence that many protein-ligand cocrystal structures contain poorly refined ligand geometries. These errors result in bound structures that have nonideal bond lengths and angles, are strained, contain improbable conformations, and have bad protein-ligand contacts. Many of these problems can be greatly reduced with better refinement models.

Indexed as

bound ligand strainProtein−ligand cocrystalstructure-based designstructure-induced fitstructure refinement

Identifiers

PMID25050154
PMCPMC4094245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.