Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25050064›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2014

Ethical and legal framework and regulation for off-label use: European perspective.

Christian Lenk, Gunnar Duttge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 2: treatment.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Off-label use of medicines in South Africa: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Off-Label Medication: From a Simple Concept to Complex Practical Aspects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. The Challenges of Crizotinib Treatment in a Child With Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian LenkInstitute for History, Theory and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Gunnar DuttgeCenter for Medical Law, Göttingen University, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 20 years the off-label use of drugs has been an essential part of the ethical and legal considerations regarding the international regulation of drug licensing. Despite a number of regulatory initiatives in the European Union, there seems to remain a largely unsatisfactory situation following a number of critical descriptions and statements from actors in the field. The present article gives an overview of the ethical and legal framework and developments in European countries and identifies existing problems and possible pathways for solutions in this important regulatory area. In addition to the presentation of the ethical and legal foundations, some attention is given to criticisms from medical practitioners to the current handling of off-label drug use. The review also focuses on the situation confronted by patients and physicians when off-label prescriptions are necessary. Through legal descriptions from a number of countries, possible solutions for future discussion of European health care policy are selected and explained.

Indexed as

ethicsEuropehealth care policylaw

Identifiers

PMID25050064
PMCPMC4103928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.