ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2013
Discrimination of korean native chicken lines using fifteen selected microsatellite markers.
Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Divergent ancestry of Korean native and Thai chickens with independent gene pool retention by Korean commercial chickens.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of the thyroid hormone responsive spot 14 alpha gene with growth-related traits in Korean native chicken.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2020Article
- Population structure analysis of Yeonsan Ogye using microsatellite markers.Journal of animal science and technology · 2020Article
- Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken of Bangladesh using microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2020Article
- Major histocompatibility complex B variability in Korean native chicken breeds.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Genetic characterization and population structure of six brown layer pure lines using microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2019Article
- Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines.PloS one · 2018Article
- Assessment of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Korean native chicken breeds using microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2017Article
- Microsatellite Analysis of the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Dairy Goats in Thailand.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2016Article
- Variance Component Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis for Body Weight Traits in Purebred Korean Native Chicken.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2016Article
- Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of Korean native chickens using next generation sequencing data.Molecular biology reports · 2015Article
- Discrimination of the commercial Korean native chicken population using microsatellite markers.Journal of animal science and technology · 2015Article
- Genetic diversity and relationships of korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the genetic diversity and discrimination among five Korean native chicken lines, a total of 86 individuals were genotyped using 150 microsatellite (MS) markers, and 15 highly polymorphic MS markers were selected. Based on the highest value of the number of alleles, the expected heterozygosity (He) and polymorphic information content (PIC) for the selected markers ranged from 6 to 12, 0.466 to 0.852, 0.709 to 0.882 and 0.648 to 0.865, respectively. Using these markers, the calculated genetic distance (Fst), the heterozygote deficit among chicken lines (Fit) and the heterozygote deficit within chicken line (Fis) values ranged from 0.0309 to 0.2473, 0.0013 to 0.4513 and -0.1002 to 0.271, respectively. The expected probability of identity values in random individuals (PI), random half-sib (PI half-sibs ) and random sibs (PI sibs ) were estimated at 7.98×10(-29), 2.88×10(-20) and 1.25×10(-08), respectively, indicating that these markers can be used for traceability systems in Korean native chickens. The unrooted phylogenetic neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using 15 MS markers that clearly differentiated among the five native chicken lines. Also, the structure was estimated by the individual clustering with the K value of 5. The selected 15 MS markers were found to be useful for the conservation, breeding plan, and traceability system in Korean native chickens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.