Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25049243›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Simple and rapid method to determine antimycobacterial potency of compounds by using autoluminescent Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Sreevalli Sharma, Ekaterina Gelman, Chandan Narayan, Deepa Bhattacharjee, Vijayashree Achar, Vaishali Humnabadkar, V Balasubramanian, Vasanthi Ramachandran, Neeraj Dhar, Neela Dinesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SMURF2 inhibits autophagic control ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sreevalli SharmaAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Ekaterina GelmanGlobal Health Institute, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Station 19, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chandan NarayanAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Deepa BhattacharjeeAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Vijayashree AcharAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Vaishali HumnabadkarAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
V BalasubramanianAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Vasanthi RamachandranAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India.
Neeraj DharGlobal Health Institute, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Station 19, Lausanne, Switzerland neeraj.dhar@epfl.ch neeladin@gmail.com.
Neela DineshAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India neeraj.dhar@epfl.ch neeladin@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major obstacle in the process of discovery of drugs against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is its extremely slow growth rate and long generation time (∼20 to 24 h). Consequently, determination of MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of potential drug candidates using current methods requires 7 days (resazurin-based MIC assay [REMA]) and 1 month (CFU enumeration), respectively. We employed a synthetic luciferase operon optimized for expression in high-GC-content bacteria and adapted it for use in mycobacteria. Using luminescence-based readouts, we were able to determine the MICs and bactericidal activities of approved tuberculosis (TB) drugs, which correlated well with currently used methods. Although luminescence-based readouts have been used previously to determine the MICs and bactericidal activities of approved TB drugs, in this study we adapted this assay to carry out a pilot screen using a library of 1,114 compounds belonging to diverse chemical scaffolds. We found that MICs derived from a 3-day luminescence assay matched well with REMA-based MIC values. To determine the bactericidal potencies of compounds, a 1:10 dilution of the cultures from the MIC plate was carried out on day 7, and the bactericidal concentrations determined based on time to positivity in 2 weeks were found to be comparable with MBC values determined by the conventional CFU approach. Thus, the luminescent mycobacterium-based approach not only is very simple and inexpensive but also allowed us to generate the information in half the time required by conventional methods.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsLuminescent MeasurementsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisReproducibility of ResultsAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID25049243
PMCPMC4187967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.