Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25048735›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Multi-tissue omics analyses reveal molecular regulatory networks for puberty in composite beef cattle.

Angela Cánovas, Antonio Reverter, Kasey L DeAtley, Ryan L Ashley, Michelle L Colgrave, Marina R S Fortes, Alma Islas-Trejo, Sigrid Lehnert, Laercio Porto-Neto, Gonzalo Rincón and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela CánovasDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Antonio ReverterCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Food Futures Flagship and Division of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Kasey L DeAtleyDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America.
Ryan L AshleyDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America.
Michelle L ColgraveCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Food Futures Flagship and Division of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Marina R S FortesQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia.
Alma Islas-TrejoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Sigrid LehnertCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Food Futures Flagship and Division of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Laercio Porto-NetoCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Food Futures Flagship and Division of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Gonzalo RincónDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Gail A SilverDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States of America.
Warren M SnellingUnited States Department of Agriculture, Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
Juan F MedranoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Milton G ThomasDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Animal, Food and Health Sciences · AUUniversity of California, Davis · USNew Mexico State University · USColorado State University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Puberty is a complex physiological event by which animals mature into an adult capable of sexual reproduction. In order to enhance our understanding of the genes and regulatory pathways and networks involved in puberty, we characterized the transcriptome of five reproductive tissues (i.e. hypothalamus, pituitary gland, ovary, uterus, and endometrium) as well as tissues known to be relevant to growth and metabolism needed to achieve puberty (i.e., longissimus dorsi muscle, adipose, and liver). These tissues were collected from pre- and post-pubertal Brangus heifers (3/8 Brahman; Bos indicus x 5/8 Angus; Bos taurus) derived from a population of cattle used to identify quantitative trait loci associated with fertility traits (i.e., age of first observed corpus luteum (ACL), first service conception (FSC), and heifer pregnancy (HPG)). In order to exploit the power of complementary omics analyses, pre- and post-puberty co-expression gene networks were constructed by combining the results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), RNA-Seq, and bovine transcription factors. Eight tissues among pre-pubertal and post-pubertal Brangus heifers revealed 1,515 differentially expressed and 943 tissue-specific genes within the 17,832 genes confirmed by RNA-Seq analysis. The hypothalamus experienced the most notable up-regulation of genes via puberty (i.e., 204 out of 275 genes). Combining the results of GWAS and RNA-Seq, we identified 25 loci containing a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with ACL, FSC, and (or) HPG. Seventeen of these SNP were within a gene and 13 of the genes were expressed in uterus or endometrium. Multi-tissue omics analyses revealed 2,450 co-expressed genes relative to puberty. The pre-pubertal network had 372,861 connections whereas the post-pubertal network had 328,357 connections. A sub-network from this process revealed key transcriptional regulators (i.e., PITX2, FOXA1, DACH2, PROP1, SIX6, etc.). Results from these multi-tissue omics analyses improve understanding of the number of genes and their complex interactions for puberty in cattle.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCattleFemaleFertilityGene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyMalePregnancySexual MaturationTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID25048735
PMCPMC4105537
OpenAlexW2094397390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.