Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25048527›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2014

Basic features of a cell electroporation model: illustrative behavior for two very different pulses.

Reuben S Son, Kyle C Smith, Thiruvallur R Gowrishankar, P Thomas Vernier, James C Weaver

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Impact of pulse duration on cardiac electroporation: nanosecond pulses enhance cardiomyocyte selectivity and promote a Raman-detected shift towards apoptotic cell death.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Potentiation of Gelonin Cytotoxicity by Pulsed Electric Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Single-Step Genome Editing of Small Ruminant Embryos by Electroporation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. 2-ns Electrostimulation of CaBiophysical journal · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Reuben S SonHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, E25-213A, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Kyle C Smith
Thiruvallur R Gowrishankar
P Thomas Vernier
James C Weaver
Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USOld Dominion University · US

Funding

Molecular Microdosimetry for Electric Fields and Eletroporation MechanismR01GM063857 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI WEAVER, JAMES C · 2002 to 2013
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM063857NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Science increasingly involves complex modeling. Here we describe a model for cell electroporation in which membrane properties are dynamically modified by poration. Spatial scales range from cell membrane thickness (5 nm) to a typical mammalian cell radius (10 μm), and can be used with idealized and experimental pulse waveforms. The model consists of traditional passive components and additional active components representing nonequilibrium processes. Model responses include measurable quantities: transmembrane voltage, membrane electrical conductance, and solute transport rates and amounts for the representative "long" and "short" pulses. The long pulse--1.5 kV/cm, 100 μs--evolves two pore subpopulations with a valley at ~5 nm, which separates the subpopulations that have peaks at ~1.5 and ~12 nm radius. Such pulses are widely used in biological research, biotechnology, and medicine, including cancer therapy by drug delivery and nonthermal physical tumor ablation by causing necrosis. The short pulse--40 kV/cm, 10 ns--creates 80-fold more pores, all small (<3 nm; ~1 nm peak). These nanosecond pulses ablate tumors by apoptosis. We demonstrate the model's responses by illustrative electrical and poration behavior, and transport of calcein and propidium. We then identify extensions for expanding modeling capability. Structure-function results from MD can allow extrapolations that bring response specificity to cell membranes based on their lipid composition. After a pulse, changes in pore energy landscape can be included over seconds to minutes, by mechanisms such as cell swelling and pulse-induced chemical reactions that slowly alter pore behavior.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAnimalsBiological TransportCell MembraneElectric ConductivityFluoresceinsMammalsModels, BiologicalPorosityPropidiumFluoresceinsfluorexonPropidium

Identifiers

PMID25048527
PMCPMC4224743
OpenAlexW1849302557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.