ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2014
Relational machine learning for electronic health record-driven phenotyping.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer patient embedding using electronic health records enables patient stratification and progression analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging BERT for embedding ICD codes from large scale cardiovascular EMR data to understand patient diagnostic patterns.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Identification of Patients With Congestive Heart Failure From the Electronic Health Records of Two Hospitals: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Establishment of reliable identification algorithms for acute heart failure or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure using clinical data from a medical information database network.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Language-model-based patient embedding using electronic health records facilitates phenotyping, disease forecasting, and progression analysis.Research square · 2024Article
- Diagnostic rate estimation from Medicare records: Dependence on claim numbers and latent clinical features.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of weka-based classification algorithms on medical diagnosis datasets.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023Article
- Validation and Improvement of a Convolutional Neural Network to Predict the Involved Pathology in a Head and Neck Surgery Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Construction and validation of a preterm birth risk assessment model using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2022Article
- Advances in Machine Learning Approaches to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Heart failure clinics · 2022Review
- Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section (VBAC) Model using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarch Process.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2021Article
- Accurate prediction of birth implementing a statistical model through the determination of steroid hormones in saliva.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Advancing care for acute gastrointestinal bleeding using artificial intelligence.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Article
- An Explainable Multimodal Neural Network Architecture for Predicting Epilepsy Comorbidities Based on Administrative Claims Data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis, applications, and interpretation of electronic health record-based stroke phenotyping methods.BioData mining · 2020Article
- Comparison of the cohort selection performance of Australian Medicines Terminology to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical mappings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Article
- A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop.Radiology · 2019Article
- Review
- Using Electronic Health Records To Generate Phenotypes For Research.Current protocols in human genetics · 2019Article
- Prediction models for the risk of spontaneous preterm birth based on maternal characteristics: a systematic review and independent external validation.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveElectronic health records (EHR) offer medical and pharmacogenomics research unprecedented opportunities to identify and classify patients at risk. EHRs are collections of highly inter-dependent records that include biological, anatomical, physiological, and behavioral observations. They comprise a patient's clinical phenome, where each patient has thousands of date-stamped records distributed across many relational tables. Development of EHR computer-based phenotyping algorithms require time and medical insight from clinical experts, who most often can only review a small patient subset representative of the total EHR records, to identify phenotype features. In this research we evaluate whether relational machine learning (ML) using inductive logic programming (ILP) can contribute to addressing these issues as a viable approach for EHR-based phenotyping.
methodsTwo relational learning ILP approaches and three well-known WEKA (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) implementations of non-relational approaches (PART, J48, and JRIP) were used to develop models for nine phenotypes. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coded EHR data were used to select training cohorts for the development of each phenotypic model. Accuracy, precision, recall, F-Measure, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve statistics were measured for each phenotypic model based on independent manually verified test cohorts. A two-sided binomial distribution test (sign test) compared the five ML approaches across phenotypes for statistical significance.
resultsWe developed an approach to automatically label training examples using ICD-9 diagnosis codes for the ML approaches being evaluated. Nine phenotypic models for each ML approach were evaluated, resulting in better overall model performance in AUROC using ILP when compared to PART (p=0.039), J48 (p=0.003) and JRIP (p=0.003). DISCUSSION: ILP has the potential to improve phenotyping by independently delivering clinically expert interpretable rules for phenotype definitions, or intuitive phenotypes to assist experts.
conclusionRelational learning using ILP offers a viable approach to EHR-driven phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.