Progress in macromolecular crystallography depends on further miniaturization of crystallization experiments.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Protein crystallization screens developed at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology.Drug discovery today · 2016
   Review
2. Analysis of crystallization data in the Protein Data Bank.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2015
   Article
3. The MORPHEUS II protein crystallization screen.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2015
   Article
4. A simple technique to reduce evaporation of crystallization droplets by using plate lids with apertures for adding liquids.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as