Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047867›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2014

Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis of gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and tissue Doppler imaging: comparison between QGS and ECTb software packages.

Fereydoon Rastgou, Maryam Shojaeifard, Ahmad Amin, Tahereh Ghaedian, Hasan Firoozabadi, Hadi Malek, Nahid Yaghoobi, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi, Majid Haghjoo, Hedieh Amouzadeh and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cut-off values of myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT phase analysis parameters of normal subjects, and conduction and mechanical cardiac diseases.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  8. An alternative method to examine the predictive value of mechanical dyssynchrony.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  9. The potential role of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fereydoon RastgouDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Vali-e-Asr Ave., Niayesh Blvd., Tehran, Iran.
Maryam Shojaeifard
Ahmad Amin
Tahereh Ghaedian
Hasan Firoozabadi
Hadi Malek
Nahid Yaghoobi
Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Majid Haghjoo
Hedieh Amouzadeh
Hossein Barati

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the phase analysis of gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has become feasible via several software packages for the evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. We compared two quantitative software packages, quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and Emory cardiac toolbox (ECTb), with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) as the conventional method for the evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. METHODS AND

resultsThirty-one patients with severe heart failure (ejection fraction ≤35%) and regular heart rhythm, who referred for gated-SPECT MPI, were enrolled. TDI was performed within 3 days after MPI. Dyssynchrony parameters derived from gated-SPECT MPI were analyzed by QGS and ECTb and were compared with the Yu index and septal-lateral wall delay measured by TDI. QGS and ECTb showed a good correlation for assessment of phase histogram bandwidth (PHB) and phase standard deviation (PSD) (r = 0.664 and r = 0.731, P < .001, respectively). However, the mean value of PHB and PSD by ECTb was significantly higher than that of QGS. No significant correlation was found between ECTb and QGS and the Yu index. Nevertheless, PHB, PSD, and entropy derived from QGS revealed a significant (r = 0.424, r = 0.478, r = 0.543, respectively; P < .02) correlation with septal-lateral wall delay.

conclusionDespite a good correlation between QGS and ECTb software packages, different normal cut-off values of PSD and PHB should be defined for each software package. There was only a modest correlation between phase analysis of gated-SPECT MPI and TDI data, especially in the population of heart failure patients with both narrow and wide QRS complex.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingProhibitinsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Dysfunction, LeftProhibitins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.