Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047623›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

Historical roots of centrosome research: discovery of Boveri's microscope slides in Würzburg.

Ulrich Scheer

Abstract readBiographyHistorical ArticlePortrait
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Positioning centrioles and centrosomes.The Journal of cell biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Centriole's Role in Miscarriages.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Centrosome instability: when good centrosomes go bad.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Centrosome dysfunction: a link between senescence and tumor immunity.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulrich ScheerCell and Developmental Biology, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, Biocentre of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany scheer@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boveri's visionary monograph 'Ueber die Natur der Centrosomen' (On the nature of centrosomes) in 1900 was founded primarily on microscopic observations of cleaving eggs of sea urchins and the roundworm parasite Ascaris. As Boveri wrote in the introductory paragraph, his interests were less about morphological aspects of centrosomes, but rather aimed at an understanding of their physiological role during cell division. The remarkable transition from observations of tiny dot-like structures in fixed and sectioned material to a unified theory of centrosome function (which in essence still holds true today) cannot be fully appreciated without examining Boveri's starting material, the histological specimens. It was generally assumed that the microscope slides were lost during the bombing of the Zoological Institute in Würzburg at the end of WWII. Here, I describe the discovery of a number of Boveri's original microscope slides with serial sections of early sea urchin and Ascaris embryos, stained by Heidenhain's iron haematoxylin method. Some slides bear handwritten notes and sketches by Boveri. Evidence is presented that the newly discovered slides are part of the original material used by Boveri for his seminal centrosome monograph.

Indexed as

AnimalsAscarisCell BiologyCell DivisionCentrosomeGermanyHistocytological Preparation TechniquesHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyResearchSea UrchinsAscaris and sea urchin eggscentriolescentrosomescleavage divisionTheodor BoveriUniversity of Würzburg

Identifiers

PMID25047623
PMCPMC4113113
OpenAlexW2153108970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.