Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047620›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

When fate follows age: unequal centrosomes in asymmetric cell division.

Jose Reina, Cayetano Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Nanocomposites Based on Biodegradable Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Centrosomes back in the limelight.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  15. Exploring the evolutionary history of centrosomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose ReinaInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB-Barcelona), Baldiri Reixac 10, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Cayetano GonzalezInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB-Barcelona), Baldiri Reixac 10, Barcelona 08028, Spain Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain gonzalez@irbbarcelona.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A strong correlation between centrosome age and fate has been reported in some stem cells and progenitors that divide asymmetrically. In some cases, such stereotyped centrosome behaviour is essential to endow stemness to only one of the two daughters, whereas in other cases causality is still uncertain. Here, we present the different cell types in which correlated centrosome age and fate has been documented, review current knowledge on the underlying molecular mechanisms and discuss possible functional implications of this process.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAge FactorsAnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionCentriolesCentrosomeDrosophilaHumansMiceStem Cellsasymmetric cell divisioncentriolecentrosomestem cell

Identifiers

PMID25047620
PMCPMC4113110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.