Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047614›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The centriole duplication cycle.

Elif Nur Fırat-Karalar, Tim Stearns

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The γ-TuRC: mastermind of multipurpose actions at the centrosome.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elif Nur Fırat-KaralarDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA.
Tim StearnsDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA Department of Genetics, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA 94305-5120, USA stearns@stanford.edu.

Funding

GAMMA TUBULIN AND CENTROSOME STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONR01GM052022 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEARNS, TIM · 1995 to 2017
$6.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centrosomes are the main microtubule-organizing centre of animal cells and are important for many critical cellular and developmental processes from cell polarization to cell division. At the core of the centrosome are centrioles, which recruit pericentriolar material to form the centrosome and act as basal bodies to nucleate formation of cilia and flagella. Defects in centriole structure, function and number are associated with a variety of human diseases, including cancer, brain diseases and ciliopathies. In this review, we discuss recent advances in our understanding of how new centrioles are assembled and how centriole number is controlled. We propose a general model for centriole duplication control in which cooperative binding of duplication factors defines a centriole 'origin of duplication' that initiates duplication, and passage through mitosis effects changes that license the centriole for a new round of duplication in the next cell cycle. We also focus on variations on the general theme in which many centrioles are created in a single cell cycle, including the specialized structures associated with these variations, the deuterosome in animal cells and the blepharoplast in lower plant cells.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCell DivisionCentriolesCentrosomeHumansMicrotubulesSpecies Specificityblepharoplastcentriolecentrosomedeuterosome

Identifiers

PMID25047614
PMCPMC4113104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.