Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047411›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

World Trade Center disaster exposure-related probable posttraumatic stress disorder among responders and civilians: a meta-analysis.

Bian Liu, Lukman H Tarigan, Evelyn J Bromet, Hyun Kim

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cognitive Function among World Trade Center-Exposed Community Members with Mental Health Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bian LiuDepartment of Population Health, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Great Neck, New York, United States of America.
Lukman H TariganDepartment of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Evelyn J BrometDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, State University of New York-Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Hyun KimDepartment of Population Health, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Great Neck, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Health and Socioeconomic Sequelae of the WTC Disaster Among RespondersU01OH010399 · OH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI MOLINE, JACQUELINE · 2012 to 2013
$998k
NIOSH CDC HHS 1U01OH010399-01NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH010399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Trade Center (WTC) disaster on September 11, 2001 was an unprecedented traumatic event with long-lasting health consequences among the affected populations in the New York metropolitan area. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the risk of probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) associated with specific types of WTC exposures. Meta-analytical findings from 10 studies of 3,271 to 20,294 participants yielded 37 relevant associations. The pooled summary odds ratio (OR) was 2.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82, 2.32), with substantial heterogeneity linked to exposure classification, cohort type, data source, PTSD assessment instrument/criteria, and lapse time since 9/11. In general, responders (e.g. police, firefighters, rescue/recovery workers and volunteers) had a lower probable PTSD risk (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.39, 1.87) compared to civilians (e.g. residents, office workers, and passersby; OR = 2.71, 95% CI: 2.35, 3.12). The differences in ORs between responders and civilians were larger for physical compared to psychosocial exposure types. We also found that injury, lost someone, and witnessed horror were the three (out of six) most pernicious exposures. These findings suggest that these three exposures should be a particular focus in psychological evaluation and treatment programs in WTC intervention and future emergency preparedness efforts.

Indexed as

FirefightersHumansNew YorkOdds RatioPoliceRescue WorkRisk FactorsSeptember 11 Terrorist AttacksStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVolunteers

Identifiers

PMID25047411
PMCPMC4105417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.