ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Medical habilitation in German-speaking countries : Quantitative assessment of content and elaboration of habilitation guidelines].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Significant Decrease in Scientific Performance after Completing Habilitation as an Academic Milestone: A Bibliometric Analysis of 742 Web of Science Profiles with Focus on Orthopedic and Trauma Surgeons.Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie · 2026Article
- Academic Career Pathways in German Medicine: Current Structures and International Comparisons.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Understanding the pathology workforce: motivations, job satisfaction, and training perspectives in Germany.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Article
- [The medical habilitation at German universities: a comparison of the regulations over 23 years].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Dental Academic Degrees in Germany Compared to the USA.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Requirements for Becoming an Adjunct Professor in Medicine: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulations of German Medical Faculties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- [Status Quo - The requirements for medical habilitation in Germany].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2020Article
- Journal- or article-based citation measure? A study of academic promotion at a Swiss university.F1000Research · 2020Article
- A comparison of medical education in Germany and the United States: from applying to medical school to the beginnings of residency.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2017Review
- [Postdoctoral lecturer thesis in medicine: academic competence or career booster?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHabilitation defines the qualification to conduct self-contained university teaching and is the key for access to a professorship at German, Austrian and Swiss universities. Despite all changes implemented in the European higher education systems during the Bologna process, it is the highest qualification level issued through the process of an university examination and remains the core concept of scientific careers in these countries. In the field of medicine, this applies not only to scientific staff at the universities but also to those medical doctors aiming at a clinical career track.
objectivesTo provide a quantitative analysis of the scientific, didactic, and procedural criteria for medical habilitation in German-speaking countries. MATERIALS AND
methodsBased on the guidelines of all 43 medical academic institutions, the criteria which candidates are required to fulfil prior to habilitation as well as formal requirements related to the habilitation procedure itself have been acquired and quantitatively analyzed.
resultsHaving evaluated all habilitation guidelines by means of 87 items, the quantitative analysis revealed significant differences in terms of number, kind and scale of criteria stated therein. Most habilitation guidelines scarcely define the capabilities applicants have to prove: concerning the scientific qualifications on types of publications for instance, no item was mentioned in more than half of all habilitation guidelines.
conclusionBased on this data analysis, the authors discuss the related literature and describe five main distinguishing areas of habilitation guidelines in terms of the set of the formal and procedural framework as well as the prequalification and postqualification criteria imposed on habilitation candidates. There are therefore substantial differences in the organization of the habilitation for medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.