Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25047144›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2014

Factors associated with pain experience outcome in knee osteoarthritis.

Jamie E Rayahin, Joan S Chmiel, Karen W Hayes, Orit Almagor, Laura Belisle, Alison H Chang, Kirsten Moisio, Yunhui Zhang, Leena Sharma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinician's Commentary on Hoteit et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie E RayahinUniversity of Illinois, Chicago.
Joan S Chmiel
Karen W Hayes
Orit Almagor
Laura Belisle
Alison H Chang
Kirsten Moisio
Yunhui Zhang
Leena Sharma
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Physical Activity Changes & Thersholds: Quality of Life and Outcomes in Knee OAP60AR064464 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2013 to 2017
$4.5M
Strength, Laxity, and Position Sense in OA ProgressionR01AR048748 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2002 to 2012
$2.8M
Relationship of Hip Muscle Group Weakness to Deterioration of the OA Knee by MRIR01AR054806 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SHARMA, LEENA · 2008 to 2012
$991k
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR064464NIAMS NIH HHS P60-AR-064464NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048748NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR054806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFew strategies to improve pain outcome in knee osteoarthritis (OA) exist in part because how best to evaluate pain over the long term is unclear. Our objectives were to determine the frequency of a good pain experience outcome based on previously formulated OA pain stages and test the hypothesis that less depression and pain catastrophizing and greater self-efficacy and social support are each associated with greater likelihood of a good outcome.

methodsStudy participants, all with knee OA, reported pain stage at baseline and 2 years. Baseline assessments utilized the Geriatric Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, and Medical Outcomes Study social support survey. Using pain experience stages, good outcome was defined as persistence in or movement to no pain or stage 1 (predictable pain, known trigger) at 2 years. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to identify independent predictors of a good outcome.

resultsOf 212 participants, 136 (64%) had a good pain outcome and 76 (36%) a poor pain outcome. In multivariable analysis, higher self-efficacy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of good outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.14 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.04-1.24]); higher pain catastrophizing was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of good outcome (adjusted OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.83-0.94]).

conclusionThis stage-based measure provides a meaningful and interpretable means to assess pain outcome in knee OA. The odds of a good 2-year outcome in knee OA were lower in persons with greater pain catastrophizing and higher in persons with greater self-efficacy. Targeting these factors may help to improve pain outcome in knee OA.

Indexed as

Self EfficacySocial SupportAgedAnalgesicsCatastrophizationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID25047144
PMCPMC4245457
OpenAlexW1552765803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.