The efficacy and safety of liquid stored blood and storage duration: a confused subject; are patients confused?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The need for an artificial oxygen carrier for disasters and pandemics, including COVID-19.Transfusion · 2020
   Article
2. Current Challenges in the Development of Acellular Hemoglobin Oxygen Carriers by Protein Engineering.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2019
   Review
3. Red blood cell storage lesion: causes and potential clinical consequences.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2019
   Review
4. 2,3-Diphosphoglycerate Concentrations in Autologous Salvaged Versus Stored Red Blood Cells and in Surgical Patients After Transfusion.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Length of red cell unit storage and risk for delirium after cardiac surgery.2014

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as