Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25046336›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Live imaging of Drosophila larval neuroblasts.

Dorothy A Lerit, Karen M Plevock, Nasser M Rusan

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Arsenic impairsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Immobilization Technique for Long-Term Time-Lapse Imaging of ExplantedFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorothy A LeritNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Karen M PlevockNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Nasser M RusanNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; nasser@nih.gov.

Funding

Regulation of Centrosome Asymmetry in Stem CellsZIAHL006126 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI RUSAN, NASSER · 2011 to 2025
$19.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HL006126PHS HHS 1ZIAHL006126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells divide asymmetrically to generate two progeny cells with unequal fate potential: a self-renewing stem cell and a differentiating cell. Given their relevance to development and disease, understanding the mechanisms that govern asymmetric stem cell division has been a robust area of study. Because they are genetically tractable and undergo successive rounds of cell division about once every hour, the stem cells of the Drosophila central nervous system, or neuroblasts, are indispensable models for the study of stem cell division. About 100 neural stem cells are located near the surface of each of the two larval brain lobes, making this model system particularly useful for live imaging microscopy studies. In this work, we review several approaches widely used to visualize stem cell divisions, and we address the relative advantages and disadvantages of those techniques that employ dissociated versus intact brain tissues. We also detail our simplified protocol used to explant whole brains from third instar larvae for live cell imaging and fixed analysis applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell DivisionDrosophilaLarvaMicroscopy, ConfocalNeural Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25046336
PMCPMC4129452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.