Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25046024›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

Production of haploid zebrafish embryos by in vitro fertilization.

Paul T Kroeger, Shahram Jevin Poureetezadi, Robert McKee, Jonathan Jou, Rachel Miceli, Rebecca A Wingert

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Principles of Zebrafish Nephron Segment Development.Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbead Implantation in the Zebrafish Embryo.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul T KroegerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame.
Shahram Jevin PoureetezadiDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame.
Robert McKeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame.
Jonathan JouDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame.
Rachel MiceliDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame.
Rebecca A WingertDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame; rwingert@nd.edu.

Funding

Identification of Kidney Regeneration Mechanisms Using the ZebrafishDP2OD008470 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI WINGERT, REBECCA ANN · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
Generation of novel models of kidney defects using the zebrafishR01DK100237 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI WINGERT, REBECCA ANN · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Genetic Analysis of Pathways Controlling Nephron Segmentation Using the ZebrafishK01DK083512 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI WINGERT, REBECCA ANN · 2009 to 2013
$644k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK083512NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100237NIH HHS DP2 OD008470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish has become a mainstream vertebrate model that is relevant for many disciplines of scientific study. Zebrafish are especially well suited for forward genetic analysis of developmental processes due to their external fertilization, embryonic size, rapid ontogeny, and optical clarity--a constellation of traits that enable the direct observation of events ranging from gastrulation to organogenesis with a basic stereomicroscope. Further, zebrafish embryos can survive for several days in the haploid state. The production of haploid embryos in vitro is a powerful tool for mutational analysis, as it enables the identification of recessive mutant alleles present in first generation (F1) female carriers following mutagenesis in the parental (P) generation. This approach eliminates the necessity to raise multiple generations (F2, F3, etc.) which involves breeding of mutant families, thus saving the researcher time along with reducing the needs for zebrafish colony space, labor, and the husbandry costs. Although zebrafish have been used to conduct forward screens for the past several decades, there has been a steady expansion of transgenic and genome editing tools. These tools now offer a plethora of ways to create nuanced assays for next generation screens that can be used to further dissect the gene regulatory networks that drive vertebrate ontogeny. Here, we describe how to prepare haploid zebrafish embryos. This protocol can be implemented for novel future haploid screens, such as in enhancer and suppressor screens, to address the mechanisms of development for a broad number of processes and tissues that form during early embryonic stages.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleFertilization in VitroGenes, RecessiveHaploidyMaleMutationZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID25046024
PMCPMC4214630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.