Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25045996›Full record

ReviewAIDS patient care and STDs2014

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for prevention of HIV in serodiscordant heterosexual couples in the United States: opportunities and challenges.

James M McMahon, Julie E Myers, Ann E Kurth, Stephanie E Cohen, Sharon B Mannheimer, Janie Simmons, Enrique R Pouget, Nicole Trabold, Jessica E Haberer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sustained-release Griffithsin nanoparticle-fiber composites against HIV-1 and HSV-2 infections.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

James M McMahon1 School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, New York.
Julie E Myers
Ann E Kurth
Stephanie E Cohen
Sharon B Mannheimer
Janie Simmons
Enrique R Pouget
Nicole Trabold
Jessica E Haberer
National Development and Research Institutes · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USColumbia University · USHarlem Hospital Center · USHarvard Global Health Institute · USNew York University · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

Columbia Partnership for Prevention and Control of HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069470 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAGDALENA ELZBIETA SOBIESZCZYK · 2012 to 2026
$44.8M
Columbia Collaborative HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069470 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HAMMER, SCOTT M · 2007 to 2011
$15.4M
Virology/Immunology CoreP30AI078498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$14.6M
Novel Measures and Theory of Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in UgandaK23MH087228 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HABERER, JESSICA ELIZABETH · 2009 to 2013
$916k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI078498NIAID NIH HHS P30AI078498NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069470NIMH NIH HHS K23MH087228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a promising new biomedical prevention approach in which HIV-negative individuals are provided with daily oral antiretroviral medication for the primary prevention of HIV-1. Several clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of oral PrEP for HIV prevention among groups at high risk for HIV, with adherence closely associated with level of risk reduction. In the United States (US), three groups have been prioritized for initial implementation of PrEP-injection drug users, men who have sex with men at substantial risk for HIV, and HIV-negative partners within serodiscordant heterosexual couples. Numerous demonstration projects involving PrEP implementation among MSM are underway, but relatively little research has been devoted to study PrEP implementation in HIV-serodiscordant heterosexual couples in the US. Such couples face a unique set of challenges to PrEP implementation at the individual, couple, and provider level with regard to PrEP uptake and maintenance, adherence, safety and toxicity, clinical monitoring, and sexual risk behavior. Oral PrEP also provides new opportunities for serodiscordant couples and healthcare providers for primary prevention and reproductive health. This article provides a review of the critical issues, challenges, and opportunities involved in the implementation of oral PrEP among HIV-serodiscordant heterosexual couples in the US.

Indexed as

HIV SeronegativityAdministration, OralAnti-HIV AgentsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionSexual PartnersUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID25045996
PMCPMC4135325
OpenAlexW2161075768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.