Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25045623›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2014

Participant retention in an automated online monthly depression rescreening program: patterns and predictors.

Supria Gill, Omar Contreras, Ricardo F Muñoz, Yan Leykin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A systematic review of online depression screening tools for use in the South African context.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supria GillPalo Alto University, San Francisco.
Omar ContrerasUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Ricardo F MuñozPalo Alto University, San Francisco.
Yan LeykinUniversity of California, San Francisco.

Funding

Does depression affect quality of decisions to participate in clinical trials?K08MH091501 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEYKIN, YAN · 2010 to 2014
$885k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH091501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet-based mental health resources often suffer from low engagement and retention. An increased understanding of engagement and attrition is needed to realize the potential of such resources. In this study, 45,142 individuals were screened for depression by an automated online screener, with 2,539 enrolling in a year-long monthly rescreening study; they received a single monthly reminder email to rescreen their mood. We found that, even with such a minimal cohort maintenance strategy, a third of the participants completed 1 or more follow-ups, and 22% completed 2 or more follow-ups. Furthermore, completion of earlier follow-ups was highly predictive of future completions. We also found a number of participant characteristics (e.g., current depression status, previous depression treatment seeking, education level) predicted follow-up rates, singly or in interactions.

Indexed as

attritioninternationalmental healthonline screening

Identifiers

PMID25045623
PMCPMC4097172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.