Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25045537›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of family medicine2014

Relational coordination and organisational social capital association with characteristics of general practice.

Sanne Lykke Lundstrøm, Kasper Edwards, Thomas Bøllingtoft Knudsen, Pia Veldt Larsen, Susanne Reventlow, Jens Søndergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of family medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanne Lykke LundstrømTechnical University of Denmark, DTU Management Engineering, Produktionstorvet, Building 424, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark ; Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark ; Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Center for Sundhed og Samfund, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Postboks 2099, 1014 København K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6284-8478
Kasper EdwardsTechnical University of Denmark, DTU Management Engineering, Produktionstorvet, Building 424, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-1765
Thomas Bøllingtoft KnudsenResearch Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Pia Veldt LarsenResearch Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Susanne ReventlowResearch Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Center for Sundhed og Samfund, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Postboks 2099, 1014 København K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4990-142X
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Relational coordination (RC) and organisational social capital (OSC) are measures of novel aspects of an organisation's performance, which have not previously been analysed together, in general practice. Objectives. The aim of this study was to analyse the associations between RC and OSC, and characteristics of general practice. Methods. Questionnaire survey study comprising 2074 practices in Denmark. Results. General practitioners (GPs) rated both RC and OSC in their general practice higher than their secretaries and nurses. The practice form was statistically significantly associated with high RC and OSC. RC was positively associated with the number of patients listed with a practice per staff, where staff is defined as all members of a practice including both owners and employees. Conclusion. The study showed that RC and OSC were significantly associated with type of profession and practice type. RC was also found to be significantly positively associated with number of patients per staff. However, the low response rate must be taken into consideration when interpreting the self-reported results of this study.

Identifiers

PMID25045537
PMCPMC4089202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.