Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25045403›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2014

Proteochemometric modeling in a Bayesian framework.

Isidro Cortes-Ciriano, Gerard Jp van Westen, Eelke Bart Lenselink, Daniel S Murrell, Andreas Bender, Thérèse Malliavin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Isidro Cortes-CirianoInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale; CNRS UMR 3825; Département de Biologie Structurale et Chimie.
Gerard Jp van WestenChEMBL Group, European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, CB10 1SD, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Eelke Bart LenselinkDivision of Medicinal Chemistry, Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daniel S MurrellUnilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andreas BenderUnilever Centre for Molecular Science Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Thérèse MalliavinInstitut Pasteur, Unité de Bioinformatique Structurale; CNRS UMR 3825; Département de Biologie Structurale et Chimie.
Unilever (United Kingdom) · GBCentre for Human Drug Research · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteochemometrics (PCM) is an approach for bioactivity predictive modeling which models the relationship between protein and chemical information. Gaussian Processes (GP), based on Bayesian inference, provide the most objective estimation of the uncertainty of the predictions, thus permitting the evaluation of the applicability domain (AD) of the model. Furthermore, the experimental error on bioactivity measurements can be used as input for this probabilistic model. In this study, we apply GP implemented with a panel of kernels on three various (and multispecies) PCM datasets. The first dataset consisted of information from 8 human and rat adenosine receptors with 10,999 small molecule ligands and their binding affinity. The second consisted of the catalytic activity of four dengue virus NS3 proteases on 56 small peptides. Finally, we have gathered bioactivity information of small molecule ligands on 91 aminergic GPCRs from 9 different species, leading to a dataset of 24,593 datapoints with a matrix completeness of only 2.43%. GP models trained on these datasets are statistically sound, at the same level of statistical significance as Support Vector Machines (SVM), with [Formula: see text] values on the external dataset ranging from 0.68 to 0.92, and RMSEP values close to the experimental error. Furthermore, the best GP models obtained with the normalized polynomial and radial kernels provide intervals of confidence for the predictions in agreement with the cumulative Gaussian distribution. GP models were also interpreted on the basis of individual targets and of ligand descriptors. In the dengue dataset, the model interpretation in terms of the amino-acid positions in the tetra-peptide ligands gave biologically meaningful results.

Indexed as

Adenosine receptorsApplicability domainBayesian inferenceChemogenomicsGaussian processGPCRsProteochemometrics

Identifiers

PMID25045403
PMCPMC4083135
OpenAlexW2144377773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.