ReviewInternational journal of otolaryngology2014
How neuroscience relates to hearing aid amplification.
Review in International journal of otolaryngology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of live aided Cortical Evoked Potential (CAEP) for optimizing programming of cochlear implants.CoDAS · 2026Article
- Comparison of Two-Talker Attention Decoding from EEG with Nonlinear Neural Networks and Linear Methods.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.Cochlear implants international · 2018Article
- Why Do Hearing Aids Fail to Restore Normal Auditory Perception?Trends in neurosciences · 2018Review
- Output signal-to-noise ratio and speech perception in noise: effects of algorithm.International journal of audiology · 2017Article
- Aging and Hearing Health: The Life-course Approach.The Gerontologist · 2016Review
- Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.American journal of audiology · 2016Article
- The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2016Article
- The Ear-Brain Connection: Older Ears and Older Brains.American journal of audiology · 2015Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hearing aids are used to improve sound audibility for people with hearing loss, but the ability to make use of the amplified signal, especially in the presence of competing noise, can vary across people. Here we review how neuroscientists, clinicians, and engineers are using various types of physiological information to improve the design and use of hearing aids.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.