ArticleJournal of proteomics & bioinformatics2013
Large Scale Chemical Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Perspectives.
Article in Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mass Spectrometric Identification of BSA Covalently Captured onto a Chip for Atomic Force Microscopy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Interaction of Bartonella henselae with Fibronectin Represents the Molecular Basis for Adhesion to Host Cells.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Exploring Spacer Arm Structures for Designs of Asymmetric Sulfoxide-Containing MS-Cleavable Cross-Linkers.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Integrating molecular networks with genetic variant interpretation for precision medicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019Review
- Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018Article
- Consistent prediction of GO protein localization.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Protein-protein interaction analysis for functional characterization of helicases.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Review
- Host-Microbe Protein Interactions during Bacterial Infection.Chemistry & biology · 2015Article
- Analysis of Protein-protein Interaction Interface between Yeast Mitochondrial Proteins Rim1 and Pif1 Using Chemical Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Probing structures of large protein complexes using zero-length cross-linking.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015Review
- Protein structure prediction guided by crosslinking restraints--A systematic evaluation of the impact of the crosslinking spacer length.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015Article
- XLPM: efficient algorithm for the analysis of protein-protein contacts using chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spectacular heterogeneity of a complex protein mixture from biological samples becomes even more difficult to tackle when one's attention is shifted towards different protein complex topologies, transient interactions, or localization of PPIs. Meticulous protein-by-protein affinity pull-downs and yeast-two-hybrid screens are the two approaches currently used to decipher proteome-wide interaction networks. Another method is to employ chemical cross-linking, which gives not only identities of interactors, but could also provide information on the sites of interactions and interaction interfaces. Despite significant advances in mass spectrometry instrumentation over the last decade, mapping Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs) using chemical cross-linking remains time consuming and requires substantial expertise, even in the simplest of systems. While robust methodologies and software exist for the analysis of binary PPIs and also for the single protein structure refinement using cross-linking-derived constraints, undertaking a proteome-wide cross-linking study is highly complex. Difficulties include i) identifying cross-linkers of the right length and selectivity that could capture interactions of interest; ii) enrichment of the cross-linked species; iii) identification and validation of the cross-linked peptides and cross-linked sites. In this review we examine existing literature aimed at the large-scale protein cross-linking and discuss possible paths for improvement. We also discuss short-length cross-linkers of broad specificity such as formaldehyde and diazirine-based photo-cross-linkers. These cross-linkers could potentially capture many types of interactions, without strict requirement for a particular amino-acid to be present at a given protein-protein interface. How these shortlength, broad specificity cross-linkers be applied to proteome-wide studies? We will suggest specific advances in methodology, instrumentation and software that are needed to make such a leap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.