ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2014
Awareness and use of non-conventional tobacco products among U.S. students, 2012.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hookah Use Among US Youth: A Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 to 2017.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019Pooled it
- Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Exploring E-Cigarette Use Among Indonesian Youth: Prevalence, Determinants and Policy Implications.Journal of community health · 2025Article
- Impact of electronic cigarettes on pediatric, adolescent and young adult leukemia patients.Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Article
- College health providers' knowledge and confidence in addressing students' vaping: Evidence from a pilot study in New York State.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Article
- Prospective estimation of the age of initiation of hookah use among youth: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study waves 1-4 (2013-2017).Addictive behaviors · 2021Article
- Confirmatory factor analysis comparing incentivized experiments with self-report methods to elicit adolescent smoking and vaping social norms.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Tobacco Retail Density and Initiation of Alternative Tobacco Product Use Among Teens.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020Article
- Attitudes and Perceptions of Tobacco-Related Products in College Students.Innovations in pharmacy · 2020Article
- Differential Trends in Hookah Use Among New Jersey Youth.Preventing chronic disease · 2019Article
- E-cigarette Use, Tobacco Product Polyuse, and Motivations for Use among Baltimore Young Adults.Health behavior and policy review · 2019Article
- Association of Alternative Tobacco Product Initiation With Ownership of Tobacco Promotional Materials Among Adolescents and Young Adults.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer.Annals of global health · 2019Review
- Characterizing Polytobacco Use Trajectories and Their Associations With Substance Use and Mental Health Across Mid-Adolescence.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018Article
- Dual- and Polytobacco/Nicotine Product Use Trends in a National Sample of High School Students.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2018Article
- E-Cigarette Use Among Adolescents: An Overview of the Literature and Future Perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2018Review
- Electronic Cigarette Use among American Indian Youth.Tobacco regulatory science · 2017Article
- The use of different tobacco and related products, with and without flavours, among 15-year-olds in Slovenia.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2017Article
- Prevalence and harm perceptions of hookah smoking among U.S. adults, 2014-2015.Addictive behaviors · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing diversity of the tobacco product landscape, including electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), hookah, snus, and dissolvable tobacco products (dissolvables), raises concerns about the public health impact of these non-conventional tobacco products among youth. PURPOSE: This study assessed awareness, ever use, and current use of non-conventional tobacco products among U.S. students in 2012, overall and by demographic and tobacco use characteristics.
methodsData from the 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey, a nationally representative survey of U.S. middle and high school students, were analyzed in 2013. Prevalence of awareness, ever use, and current use of e-cigarettes, hookah, snus, and dissolvables were calculated overall and by sex, school level, race/ethnicity, and conventional tobacco product use, including cigarettes, cigars, or smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco, snuff, or dip).
resultsOverall, 50.3% of students were aware of e-cigarettes; prevalence of ever and current use of e-cigarettes was 6.8% and 2.1%, respectively. Awareness of hookah was 41.2% among all students, and that of ever and current use were 8.9% and 3.6%, respectively. Overall awareness; ever; and current use of snus (32%, 5.3%, 1.7%, respectively) and dissolvables (19.3%, 2.0%, 0.7%, respectively) were generally lower than those of e-cigarettes or hookah. Conventional tobacco product users were more likely to be aware of and to use non-conventional tobacco products.
conclusionsMany U.S. students are aware of and use non-conventional tobacco products. Evidence-based interventions should be implemented to prevent and reduce all tobacco use among youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.