ArticleClinical and translational science2014
NIH Career Development Awards in Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions: distinguishing characteristics of top performing sites.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The African Cancer Leaders Institute: a decade of strategic development of the African next generation leaders in cancer care, research, education and advocacy.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Comparing mentored research experiences for undergraduates across institutional contexts.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- KL2 mentored career development programs at clinical and translational science award hubs: Practices and outcomes.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
- Beyond the common metrics: Expanding the impact of the KL2 mentored career development program using alternative impact assessment frameworks.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
- Scholarly productivity and professional advancement of junior researchers receiving KL2, K23, or K08 awards at a large public research institution.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- A participatory approach to evaluating a national training and institutional change initiative: the BUILD longitudinal evaluation.BMC proceedings · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify and disseminate the organizational characteristics of "top performing" National Institute of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) institutions in regards to career development, using the number of new K awards received per year to rank institutions and comparing these with non-CTSA institutions.
methodsThe authors analyzed the organizational characteristics of all 61 CTSA institutions from 2006 to 2013 using the American Association of Medical Colleges Organizational Characteristics Database and K Award funding details using NIH RePORT.
resultsFive of the "top 10 performing" institutions are in the western region, and six out of the ten are public schools. Three of the "top 10 performing" institutions receive most of their K awards through two funding mechanisms-the K08 (mentored clinical scientist research award) and K23 (mentored patient-oriented research career development awards). Notably, these three institutions lack a KL2 program.
conclusionThe CTSA network of institutions is committed to developing the next generation of physician scientists in order to meet the pressing health needs of society. Educators and evaluators within this network may need to provide training to junior investigators beyond the traditional KL2 programs in order to advance their career development as physician scientists and clinical translational researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.