Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25042330›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014

Mechanical properties vary for different regions of the finger extensor apparatus.

Kai Qian, Kay Traylor, Sang Wook Lee, Benjamin Ellis, Jeffrey Weiss, Derek Kamper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kai QianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Wishnick Hall, Suite 314, 3255 S Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60616, United States.
Kay TraylorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Wishnick Hall, Suite 314, 3255 S Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60616, United States.
Sang Wook LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, United States; Center for Applied Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Research, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, United States.
Benjamin EllisDepartment of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States.
Jeffrey WeissDepartment of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States; Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Derek KamperDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Wishnick Hall, Suite 314, 3255 S Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60616, United States; Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, United States. Electronic address: d-kamper@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms Impairing Finger Extension Following StrokeR01NS052369 · NINDS · REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO D/B/A SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB · PI KAMPER, DEREK · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS052369-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensor apparatus, an aponeurosis that covers the dorsal side of each finger, transmits force from a number of musculotendons to the phalanges. Multiple tendons integrate directly into the structure at different sites and the extensor apparatus attaches to the phalanges at multiple points. Thus, prediction of the force distribution within the extensor apparatus, or hood, and the transmission to the phalanges is challenging, especially as knowledge of the underlying mechanical properties of the tissue is limited. We undertook quantification of some of these properties through material testing of cadaver specimens. We punched samples at specified locations from 19 extensor hood specimens. Material testing was performed to failure for each sample with a custom material testing device. Testing revealed significant differences in ultimate load, ultimate strain, thickness, and tangent modulus along the length of the extensor hood. Specifically, thickness, ultimate load, and ultimate strain were greater in the more proximal sections of the extensor hood, while the tangent modulus was greater in the more distal sections. The variations in mechanical properties within the hood may impact prediction of force transmission and, thus, should be considered when modeling the action of the extensor apparatus. Across the extensor hood, tangent modulus values were substantially smaller than values reported for other soft tissues, such as the Achilles tendon and knee ligaments, while ultimate strains were much greater. Thus, the tissue in the extensor apparatus seems to have greater elasticity, which should be modeled accordingly.

Indexed as

FingersMechanical PhenomenaTendonsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingStress, MechanicalTensile StrengthExtensor apparatusMaterial propertiesSoft tissue mechanicsTensile

Identifiers

PMID25042330
PMCPMC5034858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.