Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25042283›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2014

Superior survival using living donors and donor-recipient matching using a novel living donor risk index.

David S Goldberg, Benjamin French, Peter L Abt, Kim Olthoff, Abraham Shaked

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07383194 (A Clinically Applicable Prediction Model for Living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes Using the International LDLT Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07383194 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Clinically Applicable Prediction Model for Living Donor Liver Transplantation Outcomes Using the International LDLT Registry

TypeobservationalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled3,000ConditionsLiving Donor Liver TransplantationArmsLiving donor liver transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Acute Rejection Increases Risk of Graft Failure and Death in Recent Liver Transplant Recipients.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis in the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study: Comparison of risk factors between living and deceased donor recipients.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Living donor liver transplantation in the USA.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S GoldbergDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Benjamin French
Peter L Abt
Kim Olthoff
Abraham Shaked
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort StudyU01DK062494 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OLTHOFF, KIM MARIE · 2002 to 2014
$3.3M
A population-based cohort to study outcomes in end-stage liver disease patientsK08DK098272 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOLDBERG, DAVID SETH · 2013 to 2017
$786k
NIDDK NIH HHS 5U01DK062494-12NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK098272NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK098272-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062494PHS HHS 234-2005-37011C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe deceased-donor organ supply in the U.S. has not been able to keep pace with the increasing demand for liver transplantation. We examined national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data from 2002-2012 to assess whether living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has surpassed deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) as a superior method of transplantation, and used donor and recipient characteristics to develop a risk score to optimize donor and recipient selection for LDLT. From 2002-2012, there were 2,103 LDLTs and 46,674 DDLTs that met the inclusion criteria. The unadjusted 3-year graft survival for DDLTs was 75.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.1-76.0%) compared with 78.9% (95% CI: 76.9-80.8%; P<0.001) for LDLTs that were performed at experienced centers (>15 LDLTs), with substantial improvement in LDLT graft survival over time. In multivariate models, LDLT recipients transplanted at experienced centers with either autoimmune hepatitis or cholestatic liver disease had significantly lower risks of graft failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.84 and HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92, respectively). An LDLT risk score that included both donor and recipient variables facilitated stratification of LDLT recipients into high, intermediate, and low-risk groups, with predicted 3-year graft survival ranging from >87% in the lowest risk group to <74% in the highest risk group.

conclusionCurrent posttransplant outcomes for LDLT are equivalent, if not superior, to DDLT when performed at experienced centers. An LDLT risk score can be used to optimize LDLT outcomes and provides objective selection criteria for donor selection in LDLT.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalLiving DonorsFemaleHumansLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRisk AssessmentTissue and Organ ProcurementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25042283
PMCPMC4211952
OpenAlexW1987153020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.