Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25041789›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied behavior analysis2014

Maintaining high activity levels in sedentary adults with a reinforcement-thinning schedule.

Leonardo F Andrade, Danielle Barry, Mark D Litt, Nancy M Petry

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonardo F AndradeUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine.
Danielle Barry
Mark D Litt
Nancy M Petry

Funding

TSF to enhance treatment of cocaine dependenceP50DA009241 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, KATHLEEN M. · 1994 to 2018
$40.5M
Vulnerabilities for coping-related drinking among post-college young adultsP60AA003510 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI HESSELBROCK, VICTOR M · 2008 to 2017
$17.5M
VOUCHERS VS PRIZES--CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENTR01DA013444 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ALESSI, SHEILA MARIE · 2000 to 2015
$6.2M
ART Adherence and Secondary Prevention of HIVR01HD075630 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI RASH, CARLA J · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
POST-DOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN ALCOHOL STUDIEST32AA007290 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI SHEILA MARIE ALESSI · 1985 to 2026
$3.2M
Reinforcing Exercise in Cocaine AbusersR01DA027615 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
A Reinforcement Approach to Improve Diabetes ManagementDP3DK097705 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2012 to 2012
$2.2M
Recovery Enhancement With Awards Enhancement With Awards Research Dissemination (P30DA023918 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
Healthy Activities for Prize Incentives (HAPI)R01DA022739 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PETRY, NANCY M · 2008 to 2012
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA003510NIAAA NIH HHS P60-AA03510NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007290NIAAA NIH HHS T32-AA07290NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075630NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD075630NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA023918NIDA NIH HHS P30-DA023918NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009241NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA09241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013444NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022739NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA022739NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027615NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA027615NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA13444NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK097705NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK097705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical inactivity is a leading cause of mortality. Reinforcement interventions appear to be useful for increasing activity and preventing adverse consequences of sedentary lifestyles. This study evaluated a reinforcement-thinning schedule for maintaining high activity levels. Sedentary adults (N = 77) were given pedometers and encouraged to walk ≥10,000 steps per day. Initially, all participants earned rewards for each day they walked ≥10,000 steps. Subsequently, 61 participants were randomized to a monitoring-only condition or a monitoring-plus-reinforcement-thinning condition, in which frequencies of monitoring and reinforcing walking decreased over 12 weeks. The mean (± SD) percentage of participants in the monitoring-plus-reinforcement-thinning condition who met walking goals was 83% ± 24% and was 55% ± 31% for participants in the monitoring-only condition, p < .001. Thus, monitoring plus reinforcement thinning maintained high rates of walking when it was in effect; however, groups did not differ at a 24-week follow-up. Monitoring plus reinforcement thinning, nevertheless, hold potential to extend benefits of reinforcement interventions at low costs.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologySedentary BehaviorAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatoryTime FactorsWalkingcontingency managementreinforcement schedulesedentary adultswalking

Identifiers

PMID25041789
PMCPMC4778539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.